Australia news live: Jillian Segal wants new ‘oversight’ committee to vet ABC’s Israel coverage; Hanson records podcast with Tommy Robinson | Australia news

Australia news live: Jillian Segal wants new ‘oversight’ committee to vet ABC’s Israel coverage; Hanson records podcast with Tommy Robinson | Australia news


www.theguardian.com

Segal wants ‘independent group of people’ to examine ABC’s coverage

Jordyn Beazley

Returning to the antisemitism royal commission, where Jillian Segal is currently giving evidence.

Segal is advocating for a structure in which an “independent group of people” can examine the ABC’s reporting on Israel and Palestine.

She said:

double quotation markThey can give it a huge tick or they can give it guidance as to the fact that it needs to understand this particular hatred we are focused on better.

Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster asked Segal: “Do you accept that the ABC does seek to take care to ensure that a wide variety of relevant perspectives have been represented in its coverage?”

Segal responded: “Well that is not something that I have turned my mind to as to assessing that. That’s what I’m seeking to have an oversight committee do.”

She later said: “In fact, it might give them an extra verification, an extra boost that what they are doing is absolutely fine. It’s just that it may not be fine.”

Segal earlier referred to the power of Ofcom in the UK, which enforces the nation’s braodcasting code.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Jordyn Beazley

Jordyn Beazley

Continuing on from our earlier post about the antisemitism royal commission, where Jillian Segal is currently giving evidence and advocating for increased monitoring of the ABC and SBS.

Segal has said the ABC is adding to the conflation of Jewish identity with the state of Israel by “putting stories on the record that are more negative than positive about Israel, and not covering the other side”.

She said:

double quotation markSomebody needs to do a review of the holistic reporting of a major issue like the war, because my contention is that we are dealing with this new form of antisemitism… and if we have our trusted media, for all the reasons that I’ve described, perhaps not being as accurate as it should be about the Middle East, and putting stories on the record that are more negative than positive about Israel, and not covering the other side, we are adding to the conflation, and we should do something about that.

Counsel assisting Richard Lancaster asked: “Can that truly be considered to be a problem that the broadcaster created by reporting on the event.

Segal responded:

double quotation markWell, as I just illustrated, yes, clearly, if Israel has misconducted itself, then accurate reporting, it is what it is, but if the reporting is not accurate, then I think the broadcaster has some responsibility.



Source link

Share this post :

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Create a new perspective on life

Your Ads Here (365 x 270 area)
Latest News
Categories

Subscribe our newsletter

Purus ut praesent facilisi dictumst sollicitudin cubilia ridiculus.