Trump’s ban on CNN, Politico and MS Now likely unconstitutional, judge rules in restoring temporary access – US politics live | Trump administration

Trump’s ban on CNN, Politico and MS Now likely unconstitutional, judge rules in restoring temporary access – US politics live | Trump administration


www.theguardian.com

Trump’s ban on CNN, Politico and MS Now likely unconstitutional, judge rules in restoring temporary access

Good morning and welcome to the US politics live blog.

We start now with breaking news from the late night hours: a federal judge has temporarily restored White House access to journalists from CNN, Politico and MS Now after president Donald Trump banned them due to their coverage of his administration.

US district judge Tim Kelly issued his order in a lawsuit that the news organizations filed ‌contesting the ban that the president announced ​on 18 September, saying it was ⁠likely unconstitutional.

Kelly ordered the Trump administration to immediately return the outlets’ press passes and issued a temporary restraining order that will be in effect for 14 days. Such orders are typically designed to preserve the status quo pending a closer review of the case by the court.

In other news today:

Key events

Some more background information on this ongoing situation between the Trump administration and the White House press correspondents:

The three outlets sued Trump and other members of his administration in federal court in Washington on Monday, saying the ban violated the US constitution’s first amendment protections for free speech and a free press, as well as their due process rights. They requested a temporary restraining order that would immediately reinstate their White House access while their legal challenge plays out.

Trump had said on social media that the three outlets “shouldn’t be ⁠able to constantly write or ​report ​FICTION and LIES,” ​and justice department lawyers ​had ‌sought to ​justify ​the ban on national security grounds.

A Justice Department lawyer told the judge the Trump administration provided a sufficient explanation for the revocation of the ​press passes in letters sent to the news outlets ​on Tuesday. But the judge signaled skepticism of that argument, ​noting that the letters were sent after the revocation occurred and the lawsuit was filed.

In a legal filing on Tuesday, the ​Justice Department argued that access to the ‌White House is a ​privilege, not an entitlement, and that the ​president has the authority to suspend access by news organizations.



Source link

Share this post :

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Create a new perspective on life

Your Ads Here (365 x 270 area)
Latest News
Categories

Subscribe our newsletter

Purus ut praesent facilisi dictumst sollicitudin cubilia ridiculus.